Surety Fund Decisions
Case # S-28-002, Devlin v. Radvansky
The Commission adopted the Administrative Law Judge’s recommendation that the claimant did not meet the burden of proof to establish that Marty Radvansky intentionally misrepresented facts in connection with a proposed real estate transaction. Claim was denied.
Case # S-28-003, DuBois v. Dowd
The Commission adopted the Administrative Law Judge’s recommendation that the claimant did not prove fraud, misrepresentation, deceit or conversion of trust funds. Claim was denied.
Case # S-28-007, Duncan v. Crawford & Garrison
The Commission adopted the Administrative Law Judge’s recommendation that the respondent’s motion for summary adjudication be granted and the surety fund claim filed by the Duncan’s be dismissed.
Case # S-28-008, Frazier v. Dowd
The Commission adopted the Administrative Law Judge’s recommendation that David Dowd did conduct fraud and misrepresentation that resulted in loss to the Frazier’s, exceeding $15,000. The Surety Fund claim in the amount of $15,000 was granted.
Case # S-28-010, Johnson v. Adams
The Commission adopted the Administrative Law Judge’s recommendation to deny this Surety Fund claim due to an untimely filing and failure to prove fraud, misrepresentation, deceit, or conversion of trust funds.
Case # S-29-004 Thomson v. Ribelin
The Commission adopted the Administrative Law Judge’s recommendation that there was no evidence that licensee, Ginger Ribelin, knowingly misrepresented the relevant facts to Mr. Thomson. There was no basis for a claim against the surety fund. The claim was denied.
